Menu
Google rolled out a significant change to its Local Services Ads (LSAs) this July: automated lead crediting.
The update is said to “save all businesses time and resources by eliminating the need to manually dispute leads.”
If their system works well, I expect LSAs to become even more valuable for smaller law firms or any other firm with a small marketing team.
But consider me skeptical.
Google has removed the ability to manually dispute leads, forcing marketers to rely on their automatic system. But poor-quality leads inevitably slip through and without the ability to manually dispute them, law firms will be forced to pay for them.
I’ll dive more into the specifics of this change and its implications for legal marketing below.
In July 2024, Google transitioned Local Services Ads (LSAs) to an automated lead crediting system, significantly changing how advertisers receive credits for poor-quality leads.
Previously, advertisers would manually evaluate the quality of leads and choose which to dispute. Google would then issue a credit for disputed, poor-quality leads.
The new system, powered by machine learning, will automatically evaluate and credit invalid leads, eliminating the need for advertisers to manually dispute them. What’s more, Google is removing the ability to manually dispute leads altogether.
What’s really interesting is that credits will no longer be issued for leads that don’t match the service area or the job type specified by the advertiser.
Google’s primary goal with these changes is to streamline the crediting process, purportedly making it more equitable and efficient. By automating lead crediting, Google is reducing the administrative burden on advertisers, particularly benefiting those with limited resources.
But some issues do arise with this new system.
As a long-time Google Ads and LSA specialist at JurisPage, I know firsthand how effective LSAs are for legal marketing. This move toward a more automated lead crediting system is exciting, but Google’s capability to effectively implement this change remains to be proven.
Google has removed the option for manual disputes, and certain lead types — those outside of service area or scope — are no longer eligible for credit. Although this aims to streamline credit distribution, the system is not perfect and introduces financial challenges for law firms.
Some of our clients continue to receive these ineligible leads, indicating that Google’s system may not yet be adept at effectively filtering them out.
The inability to contest these leads means law firms will face increased non-recoverable advertising expenses, impacting our budget management strategies. This is concerning, particularly for smaller practices that already operate with tight advertising budgets.
On a positive note, the automation of lead credits can save time and resources, especially for smaller law firms or those with limited staffing.
While the shift to automation could be beneficial, I believe Google may have implemented this update prematurely. It’s crucial that they address these filtering issues to prevent undue financial strain on law firms reliant on LSAs for lead generation.
As you adjust to Google’s new automated lead crediting system, you can use several strategies to stay on top of things.
These strategies help mitigate the risks associated with the new automated system and leverage its benefits, like the reduced need for manual oversight.
Looking forward, the new automated lead crediting system for Google’s Local Services Ads is likely a premature step in the right direction. With that said, it does present opportunities for more efficient budget management.
By automating the crediting process, law firms should experience quicker adjustments to their advertising spend, allowing for more precise budget allocation. This efficiency could help firms maintain tighter control over their expenses so that funds are directed toward leads with a higher likelihood of conversion. Then, less is wasted on disputing or absorbing costs from poor-quality leads.
As for the future of LSAs, Google’s move towards greater automation suggests a trend toward increasing control over the advertising process. We anticipate further enhancements to the machine learning models that determine lead validity, possibly leading to even more refined lead targeting and credit issuance.
But this control also means that law firms will have less direct influence over dispute resolutions and lead assessment criteria. For law firms and other advertisers, this could mean adapting to a system where reliance on Google’s algorithms becomes more pronounced.
Google’s increased control over LSAs is definitely something I’ll be keeping an eye on.
Google’s move to an automated lead crediting system for Local Services Ads is a major shift for law firms in handling their online ads.
This automation aims to streamline processes and improve budget efficiency, but it also means law firms will have less control over disputing lead quality.
Looking ahead, firms must adjust their strategies to thrive under this new system. They’ll need to fine-tune their ad settings and stay on top of monitoring results to maximize their ad spend.
Keeping up-to-date and adaptable will be important as Google further refines its control over LSAs.
Ready to maximize your marketing budget? Fill out the contact form or call us today for a complimentary consultation. We will listen to your story, work to define your business objectives, and recommend an approach to deliver maximum ROI for your firm.
7500 Flying Cloud Drive
Suite 625
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
10900 Stonelake Boulevard
Building 2, Suite 100
Austin, TX 78759
2005 Sheppard Ave E
Suite 402
Toronto, ON M2J 5B4
By using this website, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy. Cookies help us enhance your browsing experience and provide personalized content. If you do not agree to our use of cookies, please adjust your browser settings accordingly.
